|
|
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
1. | | ROSA C.; BACCARO, F.; CRONEMBERGER, C.; HIPÓLITO, J.; BARROS, C. F.; RODRIGUES, D. de J.; NECKEL-OLIVEIRA, S.; OVERBECK, G. E.; DRECHSLER-SANTOS, E. R.; ANJOS, M. R. dos; FERREGUETTI, A. C.; AKAMA, A.; MARTINS, M. B.; TOMAS, W. M.; SANTOS, S. A.; FERREIRA, V. L.; CUNHA, C. N. da; PENHA, J.; PINHO, J. B. de; SALIS, S. M.; DORIA, C. R. da C.; PILLAR, V. D.; PODGAISKI, L. R.; MENIN, M.; BÍGIO, N, C.; ARAGÓN, S.; MANZATTO, A. G.; VÉLEZ-MARTIN, E.; SILVA, A. C. B. L. e; IZZO, T. J.; MORTATI, A. F.; GIACOMIN, L. L.; ALMEIDA, T. E.; ANDRÉ, T.; SILVEIRA, M. A. P. de A.; SILVEIRA, A. L. P. da; MESSIAS, M. R.; MARQUES, M. C. M.; PADIAL, A. A.; MARQUES, R.; BITAR, Y. O. C.; SILVEIRA, M.; MORATO, E. F.; PAGOTTO, R. de C.; STRUSSMANN, C.; MACHADO, R. B.; AGUIAR, L. M. de S.; FERNANDES, G. W.; OKI, Y.; NOVAIS, S.; FERREIRA, G. B.; BARBOSA, F. R.; OCHOA, A. C.; MANGIONE, A. M.; GATICA, A.; CARRIZO, M. C.; RETTA, L. M.; JOFRÉ, L. E.; CASTILLO, L. L.; NEME, A. M.; RUEDA, C.; TOLEDO, J. J. de; GRELLE, C. E. V.; VALE, M. M.; VIEIRA, M. V.; CERQUEIRA, R.; HIGASHIKAWA, E. M.; MENDONÇA, F. P. de; GUERREIRO, Q. L de M.; BANHOS, A.; HERO, JEAN-MARC; KOBLITZ, R.; COLLEVATTI, R. G.; SILVEIRA, L. F.; VASCONCELOS, H. L.; VIEIRA, C. R.; COLLI, G. R.; CECHIN, S. Z.; SANTOS, T. G. dos; FONTANA, C. S.; JARENKOW, J. A.; MALABARBA, L. R.; RUEDA, M. P. R.; ARAUJO, P. A.; PALOMO, L.; ITURRE, M. C.; BERGALLO, H. G.; MAGNUSSON, W. E. The program for biodiversity research in Brazil: The role of regional networks for biodiversity knowledge, dissemination, and conservation. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, n. 2, e20201604, 2021. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
Data corrente: |
11/09/2004 |
Data da última atualização: |
03/04/2024 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
ALBUQUERQUE, S. G. de; SANTOS, D. C. dos. |
Afiliação: |
SEVERINO GONZAGA DE ALBUQUERQUE, CPATSA; DJALMA C. DOS SANTOS, IPA. |
Título: |
Evaluation of six nopal (Opuntia spp.) varieties for fodder production in the semi-arid Northeast, Brazil. |
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: CONGRESO NACIONAL, 10.; CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE CONOCIMIENTO Y APROVECHAMIENTO DEL NOPAL Y OTRAS CACTACEAS DE VALOR ECONÓMICO, 8.; INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CACTUS PEAR AND COCHINEAL, 5., 2004, Chapingo. Memorias... Chapingo: Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, 2004. |
Descrição Física: |
1 CD-ROM. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The main problems associated with production of fodder nopal in the Sertão region, Semi-arid Northeast, Brazil, are poor soils, high minimum temperature (above 20.5o C), and the armored scale insect (Diaspis echinocacti - Bouchè). A field trial was established in Petrolina, State of Pernambuco ( average rainfall 552.2 mm, 80% available from December to April) in April 2000. Six varieties were tested: three local varieties, ?Gigante?, the most cultivated, ?Redonda? (both Opuntia ficus-indica) and ?Doce? (Nopalea cochenillifera); the Clone IPA-20, furnished by IPA, a local research institution; two varieties provided by the Universidad. Autonoma de Chapingo, Mexico, COPENA F1 and COPENA V1. The experimental design was a CRB , with three replications. The plots had 16 m2 (four rows with eight plants/row) planting density was 20.000, plants/ha, for evaluation, only six plants of each central line were considered Manure was applied on biannual basis, at the rate of 2.86 kg/m. Weeding was performed manually. After four years (May 2004), the first harvest was done, collecting all fresh material except the basal cladode and the first layer of pads.. Annual fresh matter (FM) production was calculated dividing total yield by four. Mean production was 65.36 ± 22.99 ton FM/ha/year (CV = 35.17%). Varieties yields were: ?Gigante? nopal, 103.80 ton; ?Redonda? nopal, 78.04 ton; COPENA F1, 77.54 ton; Clone IPA-20, 74.15 ton; COPENA V1, 34.19 ton; ?Doce? nopal, 24.40 ton. ?Gigante? nopal was significantly superior (P<0.05) to the two last varieties, and ?Doce? nopal was inferior to all varieties. Height, longitudinal and transversal canopy diameters were, respectively: ?Gigante? nopal, 1.54, 1.09 and 1.08 m; ?Redonda? nopal, 1.07, 1.07 and 0.98 m; COPENA F1, 1.73, 1.08 and 0.90 m; Clone IPA-20, 1.38, 1.11 and 0.99 m; COPENA V1, 1.28, 0.91, 0.76 m; ?Doce? nopal, 1.06, 1.07, and 0.99 m. Other data that, such as, protein and fiber levels, might indicate that highest production does not assure the best variety for the region. COPENA F1 having shorter canopy diameter, in comparison to ?Gigante? nopal (0.90 vs. 1.08 m) would make it more s MenosThe main problems associated with production of fodder nopal in the Sertão region, Semi-arid Northeast, Brazil, are poor soils, high minimum temperature (above 20.5o C), and the armored scale insect (Diaspis echinocacti - Bouchè). A field trial was established in Petrolina, State of Pernambuco ( average rainfall 552.2 mm, 80% available from December to April) in April 2000. Six varieties were tested: three local varieties, ?Gigante?, the most cultivated, ?Redonda? (both Opuntia ficus-indica) and ?Doce? (Nopalea cochenillifera); the Clone IPA-20, furnished by IPA, a local research institution; two varieties provided by the Universidad. Autonoma de Chapingo, Mexico, COPENA F1 and COPENA V1. The experimental design was a CRB , with three replications. The plots had 16 m2 (four rows with eight plants/row) planting density was 20.000, plants/ha, for evaluation, only six plants of each central line were considered Manure was applied on biannual basis, at the rate of 2.86 kg/m. Weeding was performed manually. After four years (May 2004), the first harvest was done, collecting all fresh material except the basal cladode and the first layer of pads.. Annual fresh matter (FM) production was calculated dividing total yield by four. Mean production was 65.36 ± 22.99 ton FM/ha/year (CV = 35.17%). Varieties yields were: ?Gigante? nopal, 103.80 ton; ?Redonda? nopal, 78.04 ton; COPENA F1, 77.54 ton; Clone IPA-20, 74.15 ton; COPENA V1, 34.19 ton; ?Doce? nopal, 24.40 ton. ?Gigante? nopal was ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Gigante Nepal; Opuntia spp; Região semi-árida. |
Thesagro: |
Palma Forrageira; Produção; Variedade. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Opuntia. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/184375/1/OPB615.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03010nam a2200217 a 4500 001 1154342 005 2024-04-03 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aALBUQUERQUE, S. G. de 245 $aEvaluation of six nopal (Opuntia spp.) varieties for fodder production in the semi-arid Northeast, Brazil. 260 $aIn: CONGRESO NACIONAL, 10.; CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE CONOCIMIENTO Y APROVECHAMIENTO DEL NOPAL Y OTRAS CACTACEAS DE VALOR ECONÓMICO, 8.; INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CACTUS PEAR AND COCHINEAL, 5., 2004, Chapingo. Memorias... Chapingo: Universidad Autonoma Chapingo$c2004 300 $c1 CD-ROM. 520 $aThe main problems associated with production of fodder nopal in the Sertão region, Semi-arid Northeast, Brazil, are poor soils, high minimum temperature (above 20.5o C), and the armored scale insect (Diaspis echinocacti - Bouchè). A field trial was established in Petrolina, State of Pernambuco ( average rainfall 552.2 mm, 80% available from December to April) in April 2000. Six varieties were tested: three local varieties, ?Gigante?, the most cultivated, ?Redonda? (both Opuntia ficus-indica) and ?Doce? (Nopalea cochenillifera); the Clone IPA-20, furnished by IPA, a local research institution; two varieties provided by the Universidad. Autonoma de Chapingo, Mexico, COPENA F1 and COPENA V1. The experimental design was a CRB , with three replications. The plots had 16 m2 (four rows with eight plants/row) planting density was 20.000, plants/ha, for evaluation, only six plants of each central line were considered Manure was applied on biannual basis, at the rate of 2.86 kg/m. Weeding was performed manually. After four years (May 2004), the first harvest was done, collecting all fresh material except the basal cladode and the first layer of pads.. Annual fresh matter (FM) production was calculated dividing total yield by four. Mean production was 65.36 ± 22.99 ton FM/ha/year (CV = 35.17%). Varieties yields were: ?Gigante? nopal, 103.80 ton; ?Redonda? nopal, 78.04 ton; COPENA F1, 77.54 ton; Clone IPA-20, 74.15 ton; COPENA V1, 34.19 ton; ?Doce? nopal, 24.40 ton. ?Gigante? nopal was significantly superior (P<0.05) to the two last varieties, and ?Doce? nopal was inferior to all varieties. Height, longitudinal and transversal canopy diameters were, respectively: ?Gigante? nopal, 1.54, 1.09 and 1.08 m; ?Redonda? nopal, 1.07, 1.07 and 0.98 m; COPENA F1, 1.73, 1.08 and 0.90 m; Clone IPA-20, 1.38, 1.11 and 0.99 m; COPENA V1, 1.28, 0.91, 0.76 m; ?Doce? nopal, 1.06, 1.07, and 0.99 m. Other data that, such as, protein and fiber levels, might indicate that highest production does not assure the best variety for the region. COPENA F1 having shorter canopy diameter, in comparison to ?Gigante? nopal (0.90 vs. 1.08 m) would make it more s 650 $aOpuntia 650 $aPalma Forrageira 650 $aProdução 650 $aVariedade 653 $aGigante Nepal 653 $aOpuntia spp 653 $aRegião semi-árida 700 1 $aSANTOS, D. C. dos
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|